- The Washington Post says "The county would be better served by Cheryl C. Kagan ..."
- Endorsed by the Firefighters and Police as "strong on public safety issues."
- Endorsed by the Sierra Club for my "proven track record" on the environment!
- Endorsed by SEIU as "a strong voice... committed to issues important to working families."
- Endorsed by the B-CC Chamber of Commerce PAC as a business-friendly candidate.
- Endorsed as the "better advocate for the environment" by MD League of Conservation Voters.
- Endorsed by MC NOW for my commitment to "promoting women’s equality."
- Endorsed by NARAL Pro-Choice Maryland as the "real leader" in District 17.
- Endorsed by CASA in Action as a "courageous and effective" advocate for these difficult times.
Archives
Who Owns What?
Who Owns What?
Post #32
When I decided not to seek reelection to the Maryland House of Delegates in 2002, I was asked by countless people “who I thought would win my seat.” I felt the need to remind them that the seat was not mine. “It’s the people’s seat,” I repeated each time. I firmly believe that when I was elected, I was hired by the people for a four-year contract. When re-elected, I was thankful the voters gave me a four-year extension on that contract to represent them to the best of my ability.
I have been reminded of what seemed only semantic pickiness this past week as we heard a lot of discussion about how the Democratic nominee in Massachusetts “lost Ted Kennedy’s Senate seat.” Republican Senator-Elect Brown took issue with that concept and insisted that it was “the people’s seat” and that the people should select the candidate they preferred.
As I campaign for the State Senate, I am sometimes asked whose seat I’m seeking. In the same way, I remind them that this is THEIR seat and that it’s THEIR choice who occupies it. By parsing words in that manner, I hope that I am reminding voters of their power. At the same time, I hope that I am de-personalizing the contentious competitions that elections can become. I tell voters and members of the press that I am running FOR the Senate on my own merits and not AGAINST anyone. In that way, I hope they feel empowered to evaluate the strengths of each candidate and to cast their ballot for the person they feel will be the most effective in office.
Am I being picky in my verbiage? Perhaps. Does it reflect an important distinction that’s worth discussing? I think so. You own the seats, voters! Exercise your rights and responsibilities to ensure that the person with a ‘four-year contract’ is someone who will best represent your interests and the interests of our community.
I would love to hear from you, dear Blog reader! Do you see this as a question of semantics… or is there something important in the wording of who ‘owns’ a seat? I’d love to know your thoughts on the topic. You may send an email to Blog@CherylKagan.org or click on the "Comments" link below to express your views. Please be sure to indicate which post (#32) you're addressing.
Thanks for reading. I will post again soon.

Leave a Comment
Only your name will be posted with your comment, not your email.