- The Washington Post says "The county would be better served by Cheryl C. Kagan ..."
- Endorsed by the Firefighters and Police as "strong on public safety issues."
- Endorsed by the Sierra Club for my "proven track record" on the environment!
- Endorsed by SEIU as "a strong voice... committed to issues important to working families."
- Endorsed by the B-CC Chamber of Commerce PAC as a business-friendly candidate.
- Endorsed as the "better advocate for the environment" by MD League of Conservation Voters.
- Endorsed by MC NOW for my commitment to "promoting women’s equality."
- Endorsed by NARAL Pro-Choice Maryland as the "real leader" in District 17.
- Endorsed by CASA in Action as a "courageous and effective" advocate for these difficult times.
Campaign Finance Reports, Pre-Primary 1: Districts 14, 15, 16 and 17
Published: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 7:00 am By: Adam Pagnucco Source: Maryland Politics WatchFollowing are summaries of candidates’ campaign finance filings for the
period of 1/14/10 through 8/10/10, along with our take on what they
mean.
District 14
Senate
challenger Karen Montgomery’s cash on hand seems adequate for a mail
budget, especially given the fact that progressive groups will be making
independent expenditures on her behalf. Senator Rona Kramer’s cash on
hand is meaningless considering her self-financing capability. She has
already deposited $105,000
of her own money into her prior campaigns. At any time, Kramer can
write herself another big check and start blanketing the district with
mailers.
Of the Delegate candidates, only Anne Kaiser (the one
incumbent), Craig Zucker and Eric Luedtke have any money. The majority
of Bo Newsome’s outside contributions were accounted for by a $6,000
check from County Executive Ike Leggett. No one else is really in the
game. As of this writing, Vanessa Ali has not filed and is already
being fined.
District 15
Senator
Rob Garagiola has no primary challenger and his huge stock of cash is
likely headed to Democratic Senate candidates in other parts of the
state. Delegate Brian Feldman has always been a solid fundraiser.
Delegate Kathleen Dumais has not, but she wins anyway. None of the open
seat candidates have any real cash, but Aruna Miller should benefit
from her endorsements and her membership on the incumbents’ slate. This
is a sleepy district long removed from the two-party battles of 2002.
District
16
The
incumbent slate of Senator Brian Frosh and Delegates Susan Lee and Bill
Frick have a combined $401,591 in cash on hand, MUCH more than
necessary for self-defense. All of the action has been among the
challengers. Kyle Lierman easily led everyone in contributions and burn
rate. Ariana Kelly has the most cash on hand, but she really should
not be bragging
about her financial performance considering that she loaned herself
three times more money than she received from outside contributors.
Seven challengers tossed in a combined $195,600 of their own money into
their campaigns, guaranteeing full garbage bags across the district
through primary day. Other than Kelly and Lierman, the challengers
still must find ways to distinguish themselves from each other.
District
17
Senate
challenger Cheryl Kagan has outraised incumbent Jennie Forehand three
reporting periods in a row, but the two have rough financial parity near
the end of the race. Such a situation usually benefits the incumbent
because name recognition alone is worth a lot of money, but Kagan has
vastly outhustled Forehand for months.
Delegate Jim Gilchrist is a
hapless fundraiser and is VERY lucky that no quality House challenger
entered the race. The lack of a Delegate contest deprives us of the
opportunity to print mailers from Kumar “Bad Boy” Barve, whose infamous
sense of humor would have made for great material. Hopefully the Bad
Boy will see fit to zing Republican challenger Dan Campos.
Tomorrow,
we’ll cover State Legislative Districts 18, 19, 20 and 39.
To read the article from its source, click here.
